Skip to main content
Financial Assistance Hub

BEAR necessities lacking

29 September 2017

The banking industry today reaffirmed its support for improving banking executive accountability and highlighted much-needed changes to the draft legislation to ensure the regime works.

“Banks want to strengthen senior executive accountability to give customers more confidence in banks,” Australian Bankers’ Association Chief Executive Anna Bligh said.

“There are major flaws in the way the legislation is drafted, in particular a lack of clarity in critical areas and contradictions with the Explanatory Memorandum,” she said.

“It is unclear which parts of banks and how many of their employees will be subject to the regime.

“The Explanatory Memorandum says one thing, while the draft legislation says the polar opposite. This needs urgent clarification,” Ms Bligh said.

“The banking industry is deeply concerned about the uncertainty and the rushed consultation. The regime simply won’t work if issues are not sorted out now,” she said.

According to the legislation, BEAR would not only apply to banks but to all their subsidiaries as well. Large banks have hundreds of subsidiaries therefore the regime would capture a large number of mid-level and junior executives.

“If banks’ insurance and wealth management businesses are also caught up in the regime it will affect banks’ ability to compete,” Ms Bligh said.

“The draft legislation proposes that APRA can disqualify a person, effectively destroying their career, and doesn’t allow the person to have that life-changing decision reviewed to make sure the law was applied consistently,” she said.

“Protecting an individual’s rights and ensuring procedural fairness is essential if BEAR itself is seen to have integrity and consistency with other laws in Australia.

“To achieve this the ABA strongly recommends that the merits of any disqualification decision by APRA must be able to be reviewed, and that APRA has to apply to the Federal Court to disqualify an individual,” Ms Bligh said.

What constitutes a breach is also unclear in the legislation, with no definition provided of behaviour that affects ‘prudential standing’ or ‘reputation’.

“Neither of these terms are defined, nor do they have an equivalent in any other law,” Ms Bligh said.

“With so much important detail still to be worked out by the Federal Government and regulators, the banking industry is seeking an additional six months to implement BEAR (1 January 2019), or one year from the finalisation of all relevant APRA rules,” she said.

The ABA’s submission to Treasury is attached.

ENDS

Contact: Stephanie Arena 0477 470 677

@austbankers

bankers.asn.au

Latest news

1 / 3
Media Releases
​Australian banks launch new defence in battle against scammers
2 July 2025

Australian banks have today unveiled their latest scam fighting technology, with the launch of Confirmation of Payee – a new name-matching service designed to help protect customers from being tricked into sending money to criminals. Banks have invested $100 million in this new technology which is a key initiative of the sector’s Scam-Safe Accord –… Read more »

Read more
Media Releases
SIMON BIRMINGHAM APPOINTED AS ABA CEO
20 June 2025

Former Federal Finance Minister and Senate Leader, The Hon. Simon Birmingham, will join the Australian Banking Association as Chief Executive Officer. ABA Chair and National Australia Bank CEO Andrew Irvine today announced Mr Birmingham’s appointment, replacing retiring CEO, The Hon. Anna Bligh AC. “We are delighted to have Simon lead our industry and help ensure… Read more »

Read more
Transcript
Anna Bligh interview on ABC Radio Darwin
18 June 2025

Rick Hind: Anna Bligh is the CEO of the Australian Banking Association. Welcome back to 105.7 ABC Radio Darwin. Anna Bligh: Good morning, great to be with you. Rick Hind: Is it getting easier to scam people out of money from their bank accounts? Given how good technology is, the scammers seem to have as… Read more »

Read more