30 May 2017
Sydney, 30 May 2017: The legislation for the major bank levy introduced today shows the Federal Government’s original design had major flaws and significant questions remain on how this rushed legislation will affect the economy, the Australian Bankers’ Association said today.
“The Government has been forced to make concessions to the bank levy following the banks’ one and only opportunity to meet with Treasury on such a major Budget measure,” ABA Chief Executive Anna Bligh said.
“Banks welcome the concessions which would have had unintended consequences across the financial system, but despite these changes, major banks remain concerned about the Government’s poorly-designed tax grab,” she said.
The legislation, revealed to the public for the first time today, showed the levy will no longer apply to:
- Derivative transactions, which banks use to minimise their risk.
- Money the banks hold with the RBA.
Banks had argued for both of these changes.
“This is a tax on all Australians even with these changes. The Government’s own analysis released today acknowledges that the impact of this tax could hit “bank borrowers, lenders, shareholders or some combination of these groups”1,” Ms Bligh said.
“This levy will impact on investor confidence in Australia’s major banks and make it more expensive for banks to raise the money they need to lend to businesses and individuals,” she said.
“The major banks’ market value has already fallen by around $39 billion since the Budget.”
Despite these changes the Government still maintains that the levy will raise $6.2 billion over the four years of forward estimates in the Budget.
“Treasury has not provided sufficient modelling to explain their calculations in the Budget. At this stage, we are still uncertain just how much the levy will raise.
“There is no sunset clause which is unfair to those who will be impacted by the tax. One of the rationales for the levy is that it will contribute to budget repair,” Ms Bligh said.
“If that is the case then let’s be fair and remove the tax once the budget is back in the black.”
ENDS
Contact: Stephanie Arena 0477 470 677 or Nic Frankham 0435 963 913
1Regulatory Impact Statement pg 35.
Latest news
E&OE Radio Interview FiveAA Breakfast with David Penberthy and Will Goodings 17 March 2026. Topics: Tax paid by Australian banks; RBA Powers to regulate big tech David Penberthy (Host): Well, it’s a big amount of money, $16 billion that’s how much tax Australia’s biggest banks paid last year. And at the same time, organisations like Apple, Google and Meta, you think about the ease with which and the frequency with which we… Read more »
This opinion piece by ABA CEO Simon Birmingham originally appeared in the Australian Financial Review. In an attempt to avoid domestic regulatory scrutiny, large foreign multinationals have developed a curious rhetorical strategy. The larger their footprint in Australia’s financial system becomes, the more strenuously they insist they are marginal, incidental or merely technical intermediaries. For years, Apple has… Read more »
The ABA acknowledges APRA’s proposed capital and liquidity changes. Australian banks share APRA’s commitment to maintaining a strong and resilient banking system. ABA CEO Simon Birmingham said banks will work with APRA to ensure any enacted changes lead to real benefits for the economy and Australians. “Banks will carefully review the liquidity proposals and will… Read more »