fbpx
Skip to main content
New Financial Assistance Hub

Major bank levy legislation reveals details behind Government’s hasty tax grab

30 May 2017

Sydney, 30 May 2017: The legislation for the major bank levy introduced today shows the Federal Government’s original design had major flaws and significant questions remain on how this rushed legislation will affect the economy, the Australian Bankers’ Association said today.

“The Government has been forced to make concessions to the bank levy following the banks’ one and only opportunity to meet with Treasury on such a major Budget measure,” ABA Chief Executive Anna Bligh said.

“Banks welcome the concessions which would have had unintended consequences across the financial system, but despite these changes, major banks remain concerned about the Government’s poorly-designed tax grab,” she said.

The legislation, revealed to the public for the first time today, showed the levy will no longer apply to:

  • Derivative transactions, which banks use to minimise their risk.
  • Money the banks hold with the RBA.

Banks had argued for both of these changes.

“This is a tax on all Australians even with these changes. The Government’s own analysis released today acknowledges that the impact of this tax could hit “bank borrowers, lenders, shareholders or some combination of these groups”1,” Ms Bligh said.

“This levy will impact on investor confidence in Australia’s major banks and make it more expensive for banks to raise the money they need to lend to businesses and individuals,” she said.

“The major banks’ market value has already fallen by around $39 billion since the Budget.”

Despite these changes the Government still maintains that the levy will raise $6.2 billion over the four years of forward estimates in the Budget.

“Treasury has not provided sufficient modelling to explain their calculations in the Budget. At this stage, we are still uncertain just how much the levy will raise.

“There is no sunset clause which is unfair to those who will be impacted by the tax. One of the rationales for the levy is that it will contribute to budget repair,” Ms Bligh said.

“If that is the case then let’s be fair and remove the tax once the budget is back in the black.”

ENDS

Contact: Stephanie Arena 0477 470 677 or Nic Frankham 0435 963 913

@austbankers

bankers.asn.au

1Regulatory Impact Statement pg 35.

Latest news

1 / 3
Transcript
Doorstop in Sydney on new mandatory industry scams codes  
13 September 2024

Anna Bligh: This new framework is a comprehensive approach to the terrible scourge of scams. This will mean that every single part of the scam chain where scammers try to take the hard earned money of Australians will now have to play a role in preventing scams, detecting them and keeping Australians safe.  Journalist: I… Read more »

Read more
Media Releases
Mandatory industry scams codes important part of winning war against scammers
13 September 2024

Banks welcome the release of draft legislation to establish a new Scam Prevention Framework to better protect consumers and drive scammers out of Australia. ABA CEO Anna Bligh said winning the war against scammers will only be possible through a collective effort across the entire scams chain, including from government, banks, telcos and social media… Read more »

Read more
Transcript
Interview on ABC Radio Sydney on surcharges
4 September 2024

Craig Reucassel (Host): It’s also there was a bit of an inquiry into banking in parliament last week, NAB boss Andrew Irvine complained that he’d paid a 10 per cent surcharge when he bought a cup of coffee in Sydney. Surcharging has been outlawed in parts of the United States, Canada, Europe and Britain. Is… Read more »

Read more