Skip to main content
Financial Assistance Hub

Favouring multinationals fails Australia’s payments system

31 March 2026

Today’s decision by the RBA to slash the funding that maintains Australia’s payments system will undermine Australia’s sovereign capabilities and advantage foreign multinationals over local companies.

“The RBA’s decision will see foreign multinationals extract an increasing share of revenue from the payments system to the long-term detriment of Australia,” ABA CEO Simon Birmingham said.

“Australian banks invested more than $2 billion building Australia’s new payments system and these deep cuts to interchange will erode their ability to fund future modernisation of this critical infrastructure,” Mr Birmingham said.

“Now is not a time to further risk the capability of taxpaying Australian companies to keep investing in Australia’s future.

“International experience shows that this reduction in interchange will not lower costs for business, it will simply shift more of the fees they pay into the pockets of multinational payments and technology companies.

“The failure to consider all parts of the payments system in today’s decision makes the RBA’s proposed broader review into the entire payments ecosystem even more urgent.

“Evidence suggests that under these changes Australian banks could receive less than half of the interchange revenue from many in-person payments, which challenges the viability of current card payment models.

“The RBA’s dismissal of concerns about Australian banks’ ability to invest in payments infrastructure necessitates consideration by government of adding a requirement for the RBA to consider the maintenance of a sovereign payments and banking capability.”

Mr Birmingham also noted that the RBA has today doubled down on its previous acknowledgement that a reduction in interchange would have other impacts on cardholders:

“Issuers could recover these costs from cardholders via higher cardholder fees or higher interest rates, or could mitigate these costs by shortening interest–free periods.” – RBA Consultation Paper (July 2025)

“Banks are extremely conscious of the pressures faced by many Australians at present, but they will now need to make individual assessments on what these changes will mean for credit card conditions into the future,” Mr Birmingham said.

“If changes flow as the RBA has foreshadowed, consumers face the possibility of higher card fees, higher rates and shorter interest-free periods. “While the ABA recognises that the abolition of card surcharging is a welcome change for many Australians, the longer-term consequences of the other decisions taken by the RBA must be urgently addressed by bringing forward the RBA’s broader review of the payments system.”

Latest news

1 / 3
Speech
The value of banking: ABA CEO Simon Birmingham’s address to Banking 2026
17 June 2026

ABA CEO Simon Birmingham delivered the following introductory remarks ahead of a panel on the value of banking to the Australian economy, launching new Mandala research, at the 2026 ABA Banking Conference. Our piece of work that has been released today, Mandala providing the intellectual backdrop and analysis to support us in this, the essential… Read more »

Read more
Media Releases
Economic contribution of Australian banks laid bare in new report
17 June 2026

Surging household ownership of Australian banks, record lending to first home buyers and strong competition helping mortgage holders save up to $2,000 a year are some of the findings of a new report released today. ‘The essential infrastructure: How Australian banks power the economy’ produced by Mandala on behalf of the ABA finds: ABA CEO Simon… Read more »

Read more
Media Releases
ABA welcomes changes to streamline the Financial Accountability Regime
16 June 2026

Australian banks welcome today’s proposal from APRA and ASIC to reduce the regulatory burden associated with the Financial Accountability Regime (FAR). ABA CEO Simon Birmingham said this was a sensible measure announced in the 2026-27 Federal Budget to reduce some of the administrative burden placed on banks related to FAR. “This is a commonsense and… Read more »

Read more